Original Article
Chlorhexidine as Endodontic Cleaning Solution Compared to Sodium Hypochlorite: An In Vivo Study
Year: 2015 | Month: March | Volume 2 | Issue 1
1.D?nil? I, Evghenikos A, Petersen PE, S?l?v?stru C. Oral health – Teachers behavior change – A major factor of progress. J Prev Med 2005;13:108-15.
View at Google Scholar2.Rhodes JS. Clinical retreatment and surgery. Advanced Endodontics. London: Taylor & Francis; 2006. p. 124-35
View at Google Scholar3.Surender S. Pharmacology for Dentististry. New Delhi: New Age International; 2007. p. 304
View at Google Scholar4.Mitchell DA, Mitchell L. Oxford Handbook of Clinical Dentistry. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications; 2005. p. 8.
View at Google Scholar5.Stoll R. Endodontics in the new age and new trends. Zahnarzt Praxis 2008;11:171-6
View at Google Scholar6.Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Loma L. Endodontics. 5th ed. London: University of Washington, BC Decker Inc.; 2002. p. 251-456.
View at Google Scholar7.Estrela C, Estrela CR, Decurcio DA, Hollanda AC, Silva JA. Antimicrobial effi cacy of ozonated water, gaseous ozone, sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in infected human root canals. Int Endod J 2007;40:85-93
View at Google Scholar8.Sunde PT, Olsen I, Debelian GJ, Tronstad L. Microbiota of periapical lesions refractory to endodontic therapy. J Endod 2002;28:304-10
View at Google Scholar9.Hauman CH, Love RM. Biocompatibility of dental materials used in contemporary endodontic therapy: A review. Part 1. Intracanal drugs and substances. Int Endod J 2003;36:75-85.
View at Google Scholar10.Mohammadi Z, Abbott PV. The properties and applications of chlorhexidine in endodontics. Int Endod J 2009;42:288-302
View at Google Scholar11.Garg N, Garg A. Textbook of Endodontics. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Publishers Inc.; 2000. p. 256-66. Available from: http:// www.jaypeeonline.in.
View at Google Scholar12.Castelucci I. Endodontics. Editia a II-a. Trieste, Italy: Il tridente; 2002. p. 127-8
View at Google Scholar13.Dametto FR, Ferraz CC, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, de Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro assessment of the immediate and prolonged antimicrobial action of chlorhexidine gel as an endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:768-72.
View at Google Scholar15.Preben FR, Førsted-Bindslev, Reit C. Textbook of Endodontology. 2nd ed. Ontario: Blackwell Publishing; 2010. p. 235-351
View at Google Scholar16.Sonis TS. Dental Secrets. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, Inc.; 1999. p. 140.
View at Google Scholar17.Jeansonne MJ, White RR. A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants. J Endod 1994;20:276-8.
View at Google Scholar18.Roophasheree MS. Evaluation of the effect of chlorhexidine gluconate as an endodontic irrigant on the appical seal – An in vitro study. Endodontology 2005;17:24-31.
View at Google Scholar19.Xavier AC, Martinho FC, Chung A, Oliveira LD, Jorge AO, Valera MC, et al. One-visit versus two-visit root canal treatment: effectiveness in the removal of endotoxins and cultivable bacteria. J Endod 2013;39:959-64
View at Google Scholar20.Estrela C, Ribeiro RG, Estrela CR, Pécora JD, SousaNeto MD. Antimicrobial effect of 2% sodium hypochlorite and 2% chlorhexidine tested by different methods. Braz Dent J 2003;14:58-62.
View at Google Scholar21.Schafer E, Bossmann K. Antimicrobial effects of chloroxylenol and chlorhexidine in the treatment of infected root canals. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 2000;55:671-9.
View at Google Scholar22.Lee LW, Lan WH, Wang GY. A evaluation of chlorhexidine as an endosonic irrigan. J Formos Med Assoc 1990;89:491-7
View at Google Scholar23.Harrison JW, Hand RE. The effect of dilution and organic matter on the anti-bacterial property of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 1981;7:128-32.
View at Google Scholar